{"id":297,"date":"2023-10-06T14:23:03","date_gmt":"2023-10-06T18:23:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gmays.local\/?p=297"},"modified":"2023-12-30T14:49:27","modified_gmt":"2023-12-30T19:49:27","slug":"cryptos-real-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gmays.local\/cryptos-real-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"The problem with crypto"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

This post was prompted by Li Jin’s piece<\/a> stating that the barrier to crypto’s mainstream adoption is product-market fit:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

I believe that the more significant and urgent barrier to adoption is building things that people want. Web3 has a product-market fit problem, not a UX problem.<\/p>\nLi Jin, The Barrier to Mainstream Crypto Adoption Isn\u2019t UX \u2014 It\u2019s Product-Market Fit<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Li cites examples like Facebook and the iPhone. Here’s the thing: those are products, but crypto is a technology. TM fit, not PM fit.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Usually, new tech does existing things incrementally better until we discover what the new tech uniquely enables. Like how AI finally went mainstream when ChatGPT made it widely usable, combined with GPT-3 finally being good enough at things people care enough about. Due to its inherent nature, crypto doesn’t have this path.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Crypto’s problem: Innovating on problems instead of solutions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The root of crypto’s problem is innovating on problems rather than solutions. This is a pervasive cultural problem.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, see the below investment theses and investment areas of this crypto\/web3 fund. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fund’s investment thesis:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

What began as an experiment in cryptography has become the underpinnings of a techno-populist re-architecture of the internet that allows users to hold onto more of the value that they create.<\/p>\nVariant Fund III announcement<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The fund’s investment areas:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n