{"id":297,"date":"2023-10-06T14:23:03","date_gmt":"2023-10-06T18:23:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gmays.local\/?p=297"},"modified":"2023-12-30T14:49:27","modified_gmt":"2023-12-30T19:49:27","slug":"cryptos-real-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gmays.local\/cryptos-real-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"The problem with crypto"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
This post was prompted by Li Jin’s piece<\/a> stating that the barrier to crypto’s mainstream adoption is product-market fit:<\/p>\n\n\n\n I believe that the more significant and urgent barrier to adoption is building things that people want. Web3 has a product-market fit problem, not a UX problem.<\/p>\nLi Jin, The Barrier to Mainstream Crypto Adoption Isn\u2019t UX \u2014 It\u2019s Product-Market Fit<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Li cites examples like Facebook and the iPhone. Here’s the thing: those are products, but crypto is a technology. TM fit, not PM fit.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Usually, new tech does existing things incrementally better until we discover what the new tech uniquely enables. Like how AI finally went mainstream when ChatGPT made it widely usable, combined with GPT-3 finally being good enough at things people care enough about. Due to its inherent nature, crypto doesn’t have this path.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The root of crypto’s problem is innovating on problems rather than solutions. This is a pervasive cultural problem.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n For example, see the below investment theses and investment areas of this crypto\/web3 fund. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The fund’s investment thesis:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n What began as an experiment in cryptography has become the underpinnings of a techno-populist re-architecture of the internet that allows users to hold onto more of the value that they create.<\/p>\nVariant Fund III announcement<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n The fund’s investment areas:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n These are innovative problems, not innovative solutions.<\/strong> Will they ever be innovative solutions? Maybe, but they must be valuable problems first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When you don’t have the benefit of ease of use, you must<\/strong> focus on solving valuable problems with high awareness among users with high willingness to pay. This is not that.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Maybe, but only once there’s a cultural shift. Today, the crypto community is either obsessed with crypto for crypto’s sake or focused on innovating on problems instead of solutions. That results in a solution in search of a problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some tell themselves that new major innovations start as toys. That may be true, but not every toy is inevitably an innovation. Some stay toys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The inherent complexities and stigma of crypto mean that it must find a valuable problem<\/strong> that it’s uniquely capable<\/strong> of solving:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Crypto’s problem: Innovating on problems instead of solutions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
Does crypto have a ‘real’ future?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n